Promoter structures library
Solar and Energy Credit Promotions
Sold as: "solar lens", "buy a solar project and offset your W-2", "energy credit investment", "transferable credit purchase"
The energy credit is a passive credit. If you are a W-2 earner or an active S corp owner without material participation, you cannot use it, and the pitch usually does not mention that.
Classification A, B or C, depending on the variant.
- A, no legitimate version. There is no compliant way to do this as it is marketed.
- B, legitimate, commonly abused. Real tax law with a real benefit. Promoters break it.
- C, legitimate but aggressive. Defensible, but fact-intensive and audit-attracting.
A for solar lens; B/C for real projects and credit transfers
The pitch
Buy into a solar project and offset your W-2 or S corp income with the energy credit. Or buy someone else's credit at a discount under the transfer rules and apply it to your own return.
The point to hold onto
Anyone marketing a residential Sec. 25D solar deal in 2026 is selling a credit that no longer exists.
The structural problem with real projects
The investment tax credit is a PASSIVE CREDIT for a non-materially-participating individual. Passive credits can only be taken to the extent of the tax attributable to passive investments. Unlike suspended losses, they are not freed up against active income and are not released on disposition in the same way. Material participation requires clearing Temp. Reg. 1.469-5T(a): Test 1 (over 500 hours) or Test 3 (over 100 hours and more than anyone else, UNAVAILABLE TO LIMITED PARTNERS). Investor-type hours such as reviewing financials do not count. Add Sec. 465 at-risk, Sec. 50(b) limitations, and Sec. 50(a) five-year recapture.
Fraud in transferable credits
- authority
IRC Sec. 6418
- status
Emerging. The IRS has warned of a scam targeting the clean energy credit, with promoters misrepresenting purchased or transferred credits to individuals who cannot use them under Sec. 469. Solar industry groups have formally raised fraudulent-credit-claim concerns to Treasury.
- buyer diligence
- The seller must have a valid IRS pre-filing registration number
- The credit must be a real Sec. 6418 eligible credit
- The buyer bears recapture risk under Sec. 50(a)
- Excessive credit transfer penalties under Sec. 6418(g)(2) are 20 percent
- For an individual buyer, Sec. 469 passive limits still apply
What OBBBA terminated
- Sec. 25D residential clean energy: TERMINATED 12/31/2025
- Sec. 25C: TERMINATED 12/31/2025
- Sec. 30D, 25E, 45W (EVs): TERMINATED 9/30/2025
- Sec. 30C: property placed in service after 6/30/2026 does not qualify
- Sec. 45L: phases out for homes acquired after 6/30/2026
- Sec. 179D: phases out for construction beginning after 6/30/2026
- Sec. 45Y and 48E wind and solar: facilities beginning construction after July 4, 2026 must be placed in service by December 31, 2027
- New prohibited foreign entity restrictions on ownership, financing, and supply chain
Classification note
A for solar lens; B/C for real projects and credit transfers
What it costs you if it is wrong
A residential Sec. 25D credit claimed for 2026 does not exist to be allowed. On a real project the credit is passive under Sec. 469 unless you materially participate, so it sits unused rather than offsetting your W-2. A purchased Sec. 6418 credit carries Sec. 50(a) recapture risk to you as the buyer, plus a 20 percent excessive credit transfer penalty under Sec. 6418(g)(2).
Red flags specific to this structure
- The pitch is a residential Sec. 25D credit, which terminated after 2025
- You are a W-2 earner and nobody mentioned Sec. 469
- The credit seller has no IRS pre-filing registration number
- The equipment cannot be shown to exist or produce power
- Investors are recruited by other investors
Questions to ask the person selling this
Take these into the next meeting. Someone selling the legitimate version answers them without difficulty.
- 1Which credit is this, and is it still available after the OBBBA termination dates?
- 2I am a W-2 earner. How do I use a passive credit under Sec. 469?
- 3If this is a transferred credit, what is the seller's IRS pre-filing registration number?
- 4Can I see the equipment, and is it producing power?
- 5Who bears recapture risk under Sec. 50(a), and is there an indemnity?
Which of the Seven Markers this trips
A promised deduction or savings multiple
The economics do not work without the tax benefit
The legitimate version
A commercial taxpayer places real energy property in service, meets prevailing wage and apprenticeship and domestic content rules, files Form 3468, and either uses the credit against its own active business tax or purchases a registered Sec. 6418 credit with full indemnity and diligence.
What distinguishes it
- The equipment physically exists and produces power
- The seller is registered
- The buyer has passive income or is a C corporation
What the courts have done
How this has actually gone for the people who bought one.
The fraud that was adjudicated
- case
United States v. RaPower-3, LLC / International Automated Systems / Neldon Johnson / R. Gregory Shepard (D. Utah, judgment Oct. 5, 2018), aff'd 10th Cir. 2020
- facts
Defendants sold individual solar thermal lenses at 3,500 dollars each through multi-level-marketing recruiting, promising depreciation, solar energy credits, and business deductions.
- holding
Technology inoperable. Massive fraud. Customers were not in a trade or business of leasing out solar lenses. Permanent injunction and disgorgement of 50,025,480 dollars. Investors separately lost in Olsen v. Commissioner on profit-motive grounds.
Holding one of these, or being pitched one?
The diagnostic work is worth doing before the return gets filed rather than after. That is a conversation, not an engagement.
Schedule a complimentary consultation